Version v2 of the GSS Orientation Paper

Dear colleagues,

There has been a lot of activity recently regarding the production of the Orientation Paper on Global Systems Science. First of all we would like to thank very much those who have contributed to our GSS discussions so far, either with pieces of text, the EC consultation process and of course via the GSS blog!

So we think it’s now high time to show what we have been doing so far. Please find attached the long version v2 of the GSS Orientation Paper (2013-05-23) [PDF, 2.8 MB]. There are still some gaps and changes that will be carried in the coming days. Out of this long document we will produce a summary which will be presented and discussed in our GSS Brussels conference in June 10-12.

You can post you general comments on the text on the GSS blog, or if you have some specific comments regarding edits, typos or other issues that you do not consider of general interest to joandavid.tabara@globalclimateforum.org

Thanks a lot for your contribution to this process!

J. David Tàbara, on behalf of editors Carlo Jaeger, Patrik Jansson, Sander van der Leeuw, and Michael Resch

Workshop on Urbanization, Sustainability and Prosperty – Workshop report online

The workshop was organized against a backdrop of rapidly growing renewed interest in the theme of urbanization, which was characterized by Simon in the 1980’s as “the major challenge for [organization] sciences in the 20th century”. To be clear, that does not in any way reduce the importance of the huge amount of work that has already been done on this theme, both in Europe and in North America, in part by participants in this workshop (Batty, Pumain, etc.).

But this work is now reaching a different stage, in part due to the application of complex systems theory to this domain as a result of the work first initiated in the ISCOM project (funded by the ICT directorate of the EU, and led by Lane, van der Leeuw, Pumain and West as PI’s), which seems to be pointing to the possibility that the community may actually be reaching a mature stage in which a theory of urbanization is achievable.

Clearly, this renewed activity is also driven by the fact that the percentage of the world’s population that is living in cities continues to rapidly increase, and that many cities are now so large that a whole new set of challenges arises.

Workshop report [PDF, 1.1 MB]

The Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction

This is a post about “Disaster Risk Reduction: Government to Governance”, a debate that took place in the framework of the Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction (Geneva, May 19-23). Speakers were:

– Walter Ammann, President of the Global Risk Forum, Davos (Download Presentation)

– Lai Hongzhou, Mistry of Civil Affairs, P.R. China (Download Presentation)

– Marco Ferrari, former chair of the drafting committee for the Hyogo Framework for Action, Board member Global Risk Forum (Download Presentation)

– Shi Peijun, Beijing Normal University and Integrated Risk Governance Prject, Beijing (Download Presentation)

– Saber Chowdhury, Bangladesh, chair of the standing committee on Peace and International Security of the Inter-Parliamentary Union. (Download Presentation)

Here, courtesy of Ye Qian, a brief summary:

  1. Although there are great achievements in dealing with disasters at various scales worldwide, with major contributions from science and technology, there is still room for improvement in traditional fields, and there are major challenges for new emerging issues. For example, the impacts of many disasters now cross boundaries of countries. Therefore, a paradigm shift is needed for governments from an ex-post disaster centered approach, i.e., intervention and recovery coordinated by political authority, to disaster governance, which is a decision-making process including all kinds of stakeholders with explicit consideration of scales.
  2. In the past two decades, many countries, for example, China, have made significant progress in institutional, legal, financial and social structures dealing with disasters. There is, however, a lack of scientific ways to measure the progresses of national capacities in disaster prevention, mitigation, rescue, recovery, etc. Innovations in raising overall awareness, developing legal frameworks, implementing financial systems to transfer risks, and guaranteeing political accountability are urgently needed.
  3. To help governments make better decisions and policies for disaster risk governance, developing a comprehensive and systematic governance framework at multiple scales is the key issue. The role of stakeholders in each system must be clearly defined, especially when dealing with disaster chains.
  4. So far, great efforts have been made on identifying the problems, issues and possible measures in disaster risk reduction. A core issue of governance is how to help governments to really implement such measures.
  5. Although great efforts have been made by UNISDR and other UN agencies on bridging the worlds of scientists and policy makers, less work has been done on developing usable toolboxes as well as teams of “sales people” who have a multidisciplinary background, are really knowledgeable and capable to communicate with other stakeholders.

 

This debate is especially important in view of the process by which the UN international strategy for disaster risk reduction will further enhance the basis provided by the Hyogo Framework for Action on disasters.

 

CROSSOVER Final Conference in Policy Making 2.0, keynotes from UNDP, FuturICT, System Dynamics Society

Join us in Dublin to explore the emerging technologies and trends that are changing the way policy is made. The FP7 Crossover Conference will be held directly before the Digital Agenda Assembly on 17th & 18th June at Trinity College

What will be discussed?

  • Open and big data
  • Visual analytics
  • Modelling and simulation
  • Collaborative Governance and Crowdsourcing
  • Serious Gaming
  • Opinion Mining

Invited speakers include:

  • Miguel Gonzalez Sancho, Member of Cabinet of VP Kroes (keynote speaker)
  • Emer Coleman, former Deputy Director of UK Government Digital Service
  • Alberto Cottica, Policy-Making powered by Networks
  • Igor Mayer, Serious games for policy
  • Eliot Rich, Systems Thinking, System Dynamics, and Group Decision Support
  • Anna Carbone, FuturICT
  • Jed Shilling, Millennium Institute

For more information please refer to http://www.crossover-project.eu/InternationalConferenceonPolicyMaking20.aspx

1493 by Charles Mann

While on leave recently in Maui, I started reading this book on the global, systemic impacts – ecological, economic, infrastructure, health, agriculture, and others – of the Columbia Exchange.  It is written by a great journalist, Charles Mann, and it is wonderfully readable – quite a page turner.  What I found especially interesting about it is the system of systems perspective that the author takes on the global consequences of events.  While not express in the terminology we might use ourselves, it is a wonderful demonstration of what a Global Systems Science could accomplish.  It also suggests (to me) the value of people, such as Charles Mann, who do not look at these problems from the perspective of a single discipline, but rather can take a broader, more integrative point of view.   More…